Interagency Networks Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Interagency Networks - Essay Example The principle challenge that lies in any country is creating coordination and integration between the numerous national instruments through the interagency process. This is a major challenge faced even by the United States, a country whose power has global influence unmatched by any other country. The problem can become greater in the current century as strategy makers both of civilian and military stature struggle with geopolitical issues that will be needing fluency in fitting together all the elements and levers of power. Today, the U.S. has embassies, consulates and memberships in most international organizations. It has a singular military command system that has reach in every part of the world and even the outer space. It initiates and makes agreements that endorse peace, human rights, democracy and protection of the environment. All the instruments of American power are implemented to create a global impact. In spite of all these, there remains â€Å"the challenge of strateg ic integration, of bringing the instruments into calculated effectiveness†. The political leaders and the national security staff continuously attempt to achieve consistency with limited success through the interagency process. For any kind of policy formulation and implementation, the participants are governments or their agencies which mean governments function through the cooperation of subordinate agencies. The roles of governments for solving national and international problems are always under scanner. However, it is also needed that any structure that is created as advisory body of the government and to make strategic decisions for policy implementation should also be scrutinized. Governments function through institutions, hence officials of each institution should be categorized into coherent groups to assist the government. The challenge here is to organize the officials in an efficient manner, and to ensure positive outcomes of organizational decisions. The solution lies in performing functions in a better process, better organizations and more coherent allocation of government’s instruments. However, there is no common perspective on what is the best approach towards organizing a government’s myriad functions. Also, there is no concrete proof how well modifications in the working process of the government have worked. The demand to bring changes is â€Å"as often based on statements of belief or intent as on clearly defined calculations of institutional cause and effect† (O’Faircheallaigh et al., 1999, p.72). An organization is formed because of the